Debunking 9/11 Myths

Debunking 9/11 Myths

Why Paranoid Conspiracy Theories Can't Stand up to the Facts

Book - 2006
Average Rating:
Rate this:
Conspiracy theories about Sept. 11, 2001 continue to spread. Now, in a meticulous, scientific and groundbreaking new book, Popular Mechanics puts these rumors to rest. The magazine's editors analyze the 20 most persistent claims underlying 9/11 conspiracy theories--and conclusively disprove each one. The result is a triumph of hard fact over conspiratorial fantasy.
Publisher: New York : Hearst Books, c2006.
ISBN: 9781588166357
Branch Call Number: 973.931 DE
Characteristics: xxi, 170 p. : col. ill. ; 21 cm.
Additional Contributors: Reagan, Brad
Dunbar, David 1953-

Related Resources


From the critics

Community Activity


Add a Comment

Aug 14, 2015

Watch the video titled "9/11 - Blueprint For Truth" where a senior architect explains and illustrates the fact that the 3 buildings that allegedly collapsed because of structural faliure were in fact demolished professionally with thousands of explosive charges implante in them weeks ahead. "Conspiracy theories" are born from the fact that the official explanations lack logic, are contradictory to basic facts and entirely, totally false. For the collapse of the two towers I heard obviously hired persons forward two theories, which can't stand in any way : 1- the pancake collapse theory; 2- the "destroyed core columns" theory. The pancake theory is belied by the fact that in the ruins of the towers there were no core columns' remains standing up against the sky 300 metres high. They had been chopped up with thermite charges, as they do it in demolitions. The destroyed core columns theory is also false, because it says that the impact of the plane into the center of tower No.1 "destroyed" the 47 box-section, very strong steel columns and so the tower "remained as an empty carton box, which could not hold its weight. This is obviously false, because the 47 core columns were hit by the plane at a height of about 340 metres. Even if they were destroyed at that point, the 340 metres below were untouched by fire and mechanical damage, so they should have remained standing. Besides, their thickness gradually increased down toward ground level, to bear the weight of the tower. This theory considers the public dumb, unable to think logically. If you hit a steel rod at one end, it will not fall into pieces, isn't that obvious? The truth is the towers had been planted with explosive charges all over , and the core columns were chopped up to abt 6m long pieces with the explosives. So the "collapse" was prepared in advance with thousands of explosive charges, fired off in sequence with remote control. Read the books of Dr. Griffin to see the truth. The authors of this book were hired to sell us lies.


Add Age Suitability

There are no ages for this title yet.


Add a Summary

There are no summaries for this title yet.


Add Notices

There are no notices for this title yet.


Add a Quote

There are no quotes for this title yet.

Explore Further

Browse by Call Number


Subject Headings


Find it at APL

To Top